The transcript of this encounter with Judge Berry establishes three things that invalidate Strobel's premise and campaign for seeking Gail's contempt of violating the 3-11-2009 order for her to liquidate the investment:
- Strobel knew that the investment had already been liquidated-- invalidating any contempt by Gail to disobey the 3-11-29 order;
- Strobel knew that the proceeds were tied up in Gail's late-husband's probate case in Arizona
- Strobel was advised or counseled by Judge Berry to seek counsel in Arizona to make a claim against the estate being probated.
- Strobel later admitted that he was, or became aware that the property had been sold at a loss, Gail's initial investment of $83,000,in the partnership in the trust, would have been only 20.28% of the sale price of $355,000.